Tuesday, April 14, 2020

The Origins and the Machination Behind Islamophobia Example For Students

The Origins and the Machination Behind Islamophobia Islamophobia did not suddenly start after the horrific 9/11 event. Like anti-Semitism , it has long and deep historical roots; however, its contemporary resurgence has been triggered by the 9/11 attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. As a result of several people’s inane folly, Islamophobia distorts the photograph of the entire Muslim community wherever they live; Muslims today are guilty until proven innocent. According to John Esposito (2011), significant minorities of non-Muslim Americans show a great tolerance for policies that would profile Muslims, require special identity cards, and question the loyalty of all Muslim citizens. According to the 2006 USA Today- Gallup Poll, substantial minorities of American people admit having negative feelings or prejudices against Muslims, and favor using greater security measures in places where Muslims reside to prevent terrorism. In the same survey, fewer than half the respondents believed that US citizens who are Muslims are loyal to the United States. Nearly one-quarter of Americans-22 percent- said they would not like to have a Muslim neighbor; 31 percent said they would feel nervous if they had to fly with a Muslim man on their flight, and 18 percent said they would feel nervous if there was a Muslim woman on their flight. About 4 in 10 Americans favor more rigorous security measures for Muslims than those used for other US citizens: requirin g Muslims who are US citizens to carry a special ID and undergo special, more extensive and intense, security checks before boarding airplanes in the United States. In the World Gallup Poll, when US respondents were asked what they admire about the Muslim world the most, 33 percent of Americans’ response was ‘nothing†; the second most common answer was â€Å"I don’t know†(22 percent). We will write a custom essay on The Origins and the Machination Behind Islamophobia specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now All over the United States, a major chaos broke out over the building of a community center by a Muslim man, a few blocks down the Ground Zero. In June 22, 2010 New York Post editorial author stated: â€Å"There’s no denying the elephant in the room. neither is there any rejoicing over the mosques because where there are mosques, there are Muslims, and where there are Muslims, there are problems† This Sociology paper discusses the millions of dollars spent on organizations that support and persist bigotry and ignorance, racism; and those who create a scary environment for the Americans and the people all over the world against the Muslims living around them. The political and social environment of 2010 was a perfect time for the bigots to heighten an expressions of hate against the Muslims. Nine years after September 11, 2001, many of those who expected the Anti-Muslim sentiment to decline were wrong. As a matter of fact, the sentiment grew larger than ever; the scare was even more than the couple days after the September 11 attacks. Pew Research Center polls from 2001 show that 59 percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of Muslims two months after the hijacking of the Twin Towers (Mark Egan, 2010). Things soon began to change drastically, though. In 2002, an annual report released by the FBI showed that hate crimes against Muslims had increased by 1600 percent; 28 incidents were reported in 2000 and 481 were reported two years later (Tanya Schevitz, 2002). In 2004, only one out of four Americans talked of a positive view of Islam. According to a Pew Research poll (Pew, Views of Islam Remain Sharply Divided), forty-six percent of Americans believed that Islam was more likely than other religions to encourage violence. In 2010, ABC News and the Washington Post reported that the percentage of Americans with a favorable view of Islam was at its lowest since October, 2001. Just 37 percent of Americans admitted to having a favorable view of the Islam faith due to its supposed commands of violence. In contrary to the assumption that Osama Bin Laden’s- the biggest villain who was the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks- death would change the public’s mind about the Muslims, it did not. In fact, the fear toward Muslims grew. Two months after Laden’s death, the Religion News Service announced that anti-Muslim sentiment had grown. Additionally, CNN reported that half of Americans would be uncomfortable sitting by a woman wearing the burqa, a mosque being built in their neighborhood, or a Muslim man praying in an airport. The reason for the growth of anti-Muslim sentiment could not be the presence of Muslim terrorists in the United States because in contrary to the popular belief, there were not that many. A study conducted by the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security (Charles Kurzman, Feb. 2001) found that since 9/11, eleven Muslim Americans had successfully executed terrorist attacks in the US. In the span of more than nine years, they had killed 33 people. In comparison, the United States had witnessed approximately 150,000 murders in the same amount of time. .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 , .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .postImageUrl , .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 , .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866:hover , .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866:visited , .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866:active { border:0!important; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866:active , .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866 .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u1bfe466dd01b27ae2f24feb611309866:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Islamophobi A Thing Of The Past Or Still Present EssayWhat then, is the cause of such persistent anti-Muslim sentiment? Why is it that ten years after September 11, 2001, fear, mistrust, and hatred of Muslims were at their peak? As it turns out, ever since the hijacking of the Twin Towers, right-wing fear merchants were doing everything they could to keep and exacerbate the decade-long spasm of Islamophobia. Bigoted bloggers, fundamentalist religious leaders, Fox News pundits, racist politicians, religious Zionists labored since the day the Twin Towers were attacked, to scapegoat the entire Muslim community as a rising dangerous power and influence in the West. One example of a fear-dispensation agent is Stop Islamization of America (SIOA), an Islamophobic activist group headed by blogger Pamela Geller. On May 6, 2010, she wrote about Park 51 on Atlas Shrugs that was to shake the American public called â€Å"Monster Mosque Pushes Ahead in Shadow of World Trade Center Islamic Death and Destruction,† disapproving the proposed Muslim community center set to be built two blocks away from the fallen Twin Towers. Initially, not many people disapproved the project. In fact, many people endorsed the idea of having a cultural center that would strengthen the ties between Muslims and people of all faiths. Even conservative political commentator Laura Ingraham from FOX news liked the idea. â€Å"I can’t find many people who have a problem with it,† she said (mediamatters.org). Soon after, when the Lower Manhattan Community Board had voted 29-1 in favor of allowing the project to move forward, Geller blogged again. She stated: â₠¬Å"What better way to mark your territory than to plant a giant mosque on the still-barren land of the World Trade CenterHow Disgusting.† Within an hour of blogging her write-up and posting it on various Facebook pages and Twitter, Geller became an overnight celebrity who was making money out of her ignorant write-ups on her own blog. In one of her video blogs posted on Youtube ( Geller, Pamela â€Å"Atlas Shrugs Vlogs A Very Merry Christmas To Our Soldiers) Geller in her sunbathing suit sent greetings to the American troops in the Middle East during her vacation in Florida. She stated: â€Å"I want to thank the troops for sacrificing everything so that I can be here in my bathing suit, opening up my incredibly big mouth and saying exactly what I want.† Then she picked up a magazine that highlighted the latest hijab trends, she called the depictions â€Å"moronic.† Changing the subject to the 2012 US presidential elections, Geller said: â€Å"I am going to endorse any candidate who can beat the anti-Christ on the Democratic ticket. First of all, the choice is a Muslim,† she said, referring to President Barack Obama. Geller is also the person who had launched the Anti-Muslim ads in New York’s subway. The ads are currently on some of Chicago’s CTA busses as well â€Å"protected† by the First Amendment. Another such example of an Islamophobia agent, a fellow friend of Geller’s, is an American blogger Robert Spencer who receives a paycheck from his boss, David Horowitz, for his bigotry and hate spreading messages on his daily blog posts for Jihad Watch. His is quite a lucrative investment! Geller and Spencer combined the Atlas Shrug and Jihad Watch to start a movement called Freedom Defense Initiative, to act against the â€Å"treason being committed by national, state, and local governments, the mainstream media, and others in their capitulation to global jihad and Islamic supremacism(Lean, The Islamophobia Industry p.54).† This federation helped- and still does today-, them in further spreading of the hatred and bigotry against the Muslims by misinterpreting the Quran and making up lies in conferences organized by themselves or their fellow friends who are in favor of the growing Islamophobia sentiment. Another hate group is a three-way alliance comprising of conservative Evangelical Christian groups with pro-Israeli camps and factions of the Tea Party. The â€Å"teavengelicals† as Nathan Lean calls them, are an emotional and vocal crew and have been one of the starters of the Sharia scare impinging the American society. This three-way alliance binds so strongly because they agree and try to exacerbate the ignorant statements like â€Å"Sharia law is taking over America, that Christianity is the only way, and that the Palestinians must relinquish their land to the Jews.† This alliance has planted chapters of local activists in all 50 states, lobbying elected officials to implement legislation that would block the supposedly emerging Muslim menace (Lean, The Islamophobia Industry p. 125). .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a , .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .postImageUrl , .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a , .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a:hover , .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a:visited , .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a:active { border:0!important; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a:active , .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7e89b9121a3cd51aa94c4c3bbd6bf68a:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Massive Anti-Islam Sentiment in the United States EssayThis three-way alliance unfortunately had succeeded in their ambition to spread hatred. Even prominent people like the former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich made Anti-Muslim statements his campaign’s central platform for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination just several months ago. This, by all means, confirmed the Islamophobic ideology of the far-right wing candidates. A 2010 Newsweek (Obama/Muslims) poll found that 52 percent of Republicans believed that President Barack Obama sympathized with Muslim fundamentalists and wanted to impose Sharia law in the United States! When the 2012 election cycle was coming along and with it came very familiar stereotypes, false claims, and emails adducing that President Obama was a Muslim. A Public policy poll that took place in Mississippi in March of 2012 reported that 52 percent of Mississippi Republican voters believed that the president was a Muslim-even if he were a Muslim, he is probably the worst one not walking into a mosque even once during his first term presidency as opposed to Bush’s couple visits, even 6 days after the 9/11 attacks-; 36 percent were not sure and 12 percent said â€Å"they took his word† that he was a Christian. As ridiculous as it sounds, one in four of these respondents said that the interracial marriage of president’s parents should have been illegal! Last but not least, among the many Islamophobia agents stands FOX news as one of the most productive in spreading hatred and bigotry. In February 2011, the Think Progress website released a study that detailed the specific ways that Fox News manipulates language to insinuate, or state explicitly, that Muslims and Islam should be feared. Using three months’ worth of material gathered from various television programs from November 2010 to January 2011, a graph was compiled to show that the network disproportionately deployed terms that reflected a negative view of Muslims more so than its competitors. For example, Fox used the term â€Å"Sharia† 58 times over a three month period while MSNBC used it 19 times. Similarly, Fox hosts brought up the phrases â€Å"radical Islam† or â€Å"extremist Islam† 107 times in three months, while MSNBC used it only 24 times. Still, Fox used the word â€Å"jihad† 65 times, while MSNBC used it 13 times (Seitz-Wald, Thi nk Progress, 2011)† The fact that Fox used these terms was not the problem, but the way they were used was. According to the poll conducted, these phrases were often used as part of stories that made a larger point about allegedly nefarious Muslims who had either participated in some act of violence or were thought to be working their way into the politics of the U.S. Islamophobia, like anti-Semitism, will not be eradicated easily or any time soon. As can be very well observed from the history of anti-Semitism, and of racism in America, bigots, ignorants, and racists are not born. As the lyrics from the musical South Pacific very well remind us: â€Å"You’ve got to be taught to hate and fear, you’ve got to be taught from year to year,† the public needs to be educated from year to year, whether it be for or against Islamophobia. I side with the against-Islamophobia and believe that the society should be educated about what the Islamic faith really is and try to understand why the adherents of this faith say â€Å"Assalamu Alaikum† to greet each other. Works Cited Video at  . Pamela Geller, â€Å"Atlas Shrugs Vlogs A Very Merry Christmas To Our Soldiers,† December 24, 2007  . Mark Egan, â€Å"Fears Rise Over Growing Anti-Muslim Feelin in US,† September 12, 2010, Reuters,http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/09/12/us-usa-muslims-view-idUSTRE68BO92010912. Tanya Schevitz, â€Å"FBI Sees Leap in Anti-Muslim Bias Hate Crimes,† November 26, 2002, San Francisco Chronicle. Pew Research Center, â€Å"Views of Islam Remain Sharply Divided,† September 9, 2004 http://www.people-press.org/files/2011/02/96.pdf. â€Å"ABC News, Washington Post Poll: Views of Islam,† September 8, 2010  . Charles Kurzman, â€Å"Muslim-American Terrorism Since 9/11: An Accounting,† February 2, 2012, Triangle Center for Terrorism and Homeland Security. Newsweek Poll: Obama/Muslims, Princeton Survey Research Associates International,† August 27, 2010  . â€Å"Very Close Race in Both Alabama and Mississippi,† March 12, 2012, Public Policy Polling  . Lean, N. (2012). The Islamophobia Industry (p. 13). London, England: Pluto Press. Alex Seitz-Wald, â€Å"Fox News Watchers Consistently More Likely To have Negative Views of Muslims,† February 16, 2011, Think Progress  . Esposito, John L., and Dalia Mogahed. WHO SPEAKS FOR ISLAM? What a Billion Muslims Really Think. New York: Gallup Press, 2007. Print.

Sunday, April 12, 2020

Writing a Sample Synthesis Essay

Writing a Sample Synthesis EssayIf you are currently in college or have been in the past, you probably have a sample synthesis essay that you have written in your portfolio. That is, if you aren't writing an entire thesis at once. Maybe you have finished up with your plan and you feel like you have enough information for it to be complete.The reason you need to complete a sample synthesis essay first is that there are some key things that are required to do that are typically needed to write a thesis. In fact, most professional writers will tell you that it is not necessary to write a thesis if you aren't going to do the research necessary to back it up. If you can write up a decent synthesis essay, you'll get through the tedious part of the research process.It will also give you the opportunity to prepare yourself for the more difficult portion of the assignment - the essay itself. Writing is what you do when you're first beginning out in the field, and once you know the rules and c onventions of the trade, you won't even have to think about writing. Writing has become second nature to you already.So, instead of writing a thesis, you might decide to write a synthesis and do it in the format that you would need to do a thesis. That means that you would change it to add your personal touch and reflect what you have learned throughout the semester.A synthesis is typically five to ten pages long, but it can be shorter or longer, depending on how much you're writing on one subject at a time. One that I usually do is one page for each course. That way, I'm only writing one hour at a time. For a paper on molecular biology, you could put down a sentence here, a paragraph there, and then throw in a few sentences in between if you need to.Most students actually finishup with their thesis either the summer before they graduate or during the second semester, so it's not necessary to put a thesis in right away. However, it is necessary to have all of the information in one place at all times, so the thesis would be just as useless without the final result.Once you know how to write a thesis, you'll never go wrong with any research you do again. You'll also make sure you always have that right strategy ready for whenever your thesis comes up.

Thursday, March 12, 2020

Native American Historical and Political Development Essays

Native American Historical and Political Development Essays Native American Historical and Political Development Essay Native American Historical and Political Development Essay Essay Topic: Historical Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Native American Historical and Political Development Native American pottery is a form of art that has existed for at least 700 centuries within the Americas. Pottery can be defined as any objects that are made of fired clay ceramics. Ceramics are commonly used as practical cooking vessels, serving and preservation vessels, burial urns, sculptures, musical instruments, ceremonial items, censers, and countless other art forms. Since they are resilient, ceramic items have been a vital source of information in learning more about Pre-Columbian indigenous cultures. The earliest ceramics discovered in the Americas were discovered in the lower Amazon Basin around the Caverna de Pedra Pintada areas that were dated back to about 5,000 years (Ferguson et al 13). Some of the shards at this location were tempered using mollusk shells that allowed the ceramics to be carbon dated. From the engravings, it was evident that the first ceramic-making cultures were shellfish-gatherers and fishers. Ceramics next surfaced across northern South America and then later in the western part of South America. As of this period (4530BCE), the primary purpose of ceramic objects was to store food (Ferguson et al 23). Historical background of pottery and ceramics The communities of Mesoamerica and South America were generally modern with the European Christian period. Both tribes were quickly eliminated by the Spanish invasion following on the journeys of discovery done by Columbus. The vanquishers instantly found themselves in disagreements with the native inhabitants. The clergy sought to convert people to Christianity, and they used less aggressive techniques entrenched in religion in order to destroy a whole culture gradually. The two principal empires, the Aztecs of Mesoamerica and the Incas of Peru exhibited agricultural activities and promoted architecture and art. The monuments discovered later were extremely extraordinary even though they were developed by highly primitive societies (Ferguson et al 21). Early Pre-Columbian Civilizations Several pre-Columbian societies existed over several periods, and they served to transmit the skill of pottery and that of making ceramics to the next generation, up to what it is today. Analyzing the lineage and progress of these communities from the past to the present will give more insight on their unique skills, artwork and cultural practices. The Chavin tribe that existed around 1400 to 300 BC was perhaps the most ancient tribe to exist in America (Schurr et al 177). Evidence of pottery and other crafts existed, but these were mostly limited to the temple galleries indicating that they held a religious significance. By 2000 BCE, pottery and ceramic making was popular in Central America, although modern techniques and machinery such as the potter’s wheel and glazing were not used. The two main methods of fashioning pots were to use bare hands or made inside molds and finished using fine polychrome (Ferguson et al 15). The Moche tribe that came up from 100-700 AD was more aggressive in their ceramics and pottery skills. Their pottery was immensely influential in illustrating different societal figures such as priests, lords and even warriors. Through these discovered pottery, most archeologists have been able to study the level of complexity of the Moche society. These artists engaged in documenting pre-Columbian accomplishments through realism and pictorials. There were even instances of erotic pottery. The Nazca tribe came up from 200to 800 AD to introduce aspects of color and complex designs to pottery in a fashion that contrasted the restrained styles typical of Moche ceramics (Schurr et al 178). The last regime to propagate the pottery tradition significantly was the Huari-Tiahuanaco hegemony that created pottery characterized by audacious designs, richer colors and solid constructions. This pottery style ultimately overshadowed the other earlier forms of pottery making to become the most domi nant type that spread throughout most of America. Many pre-Columbian civilizations set up permanent urban communities where they practiced agriculture and developed intricate societal hierarchies. The oldest mound complex in the Americas, the Watson Brake and other archaic sites were constructed by pre-ceramic societies. Throughout the various studies among different cultures and different periods, it is notable that each society had some pottery or ceramics that they created, especially in cases where the society was involved in agriculture. The Native Americans developed their own techniques of pottery and ceramics in a manner similar to that of other societies throughout the world. Many of the Native American communities used ceramics and pottery even before the Europeans first inhabited the Americas. While some hunter-gatherer tribes did not delve so much into this unique pottery, the communities that engaged in farming had various uses for the Native American ceramics (Ferguson et al 67). As the Native Americans were relocated across the continent by Europeans, they were able to transport their Native American ceramics on the journey. Many of the communities ultimately appeared to have lost their indigenous pottery as they were pressed further away from their initial native regions. The southwestern Indians were the most advantageous group in that they were able to salvage most of their artwork including pottery and other ceramics. Some of their striking ceramic works comprised of wedding vases with double spouts and other colorful ceramics that had distinctive designs. Various communities had their own techniques and patterns of creating the Native American ceramics (Fash Luja?n 18). Some of the methods including kiln firing the pottery but almost each community had its own unique pattern and method of finishing the ceramics (Ferguson et al 34). The common aspect among all the communities was that their ceramics were all hand made. Even presently, the few existing Native Americans still hold the ability to create ceramics using their skillful hands. Most of these artists have become very famous, as their works on Native American culture have been displayed in famous galleries and shows. Therefore, while most indigenous Indians lost their land during the relocation process, they were still able to preserve much of their traditions and skills including Native American pottery (Kampen-O’Riley 37). The decorative ceramic ornaments and other pottery items carried with them a vast amount of knowledge on the social and religious values within the pre-Columbian societies. These people had transcended from the essential subsistence life into complex and creative groups within the harsh life of the wildness. These pre-Columbian societies held some of the initial sources of early inventiveness, imagination, and functionality. Apart from religious and social significance, the ceramics and pottery were very important in running the economy through trading activities and negotiation sessions among communities (Ferguson et al 345). Colonization of the New World and loss of Pre-Columbian Culture Pottery and other works of art largely disappeared after the entry of Europeans into Native America. The loss of a larger part of the Western hemisphere led to several administrative, physical and cultural changes for the Native Americans who inhabited the land. The religious and cultural arrogance exhibited by the Europeans was largely to blame for the great disappearance of most elements of pre-Columbian cultures (Kampen-O’Riley 22). Settlers who inhabited the Americas failed to see anything of value in pre-Columbian America and instead sought to impose their own traditions, cultures and norms onto the natives. This was a major cause of the loss of cultural practices such as pottery. Concerning the loss of cultural elements among the Native Americans, Europeans played a major role in ensuring they were eliminated from any historical records. Through their own cultural arrogance, Europeans were able to dismiss the historical existence of Native Americans as being recreated and falsified. To that extent, they considered these natives as having lived in an unhistorical state. Disease outbreaks were another major cause of cultural loss (Bulmer-Thomas et al 18). While Europeans were used to keeping their livestock in close quarters, the Native Americans quickly contracted and died from epidemics and this thinned out the number of artists that could pass on the tradition of making ceramics and other similar products (Ferguson et al 11). Significance of Ceramics and Pottery Religious importance When evaluating non-western art, it is imperative to bear in mind that the objects being viewed were created for exceptionally precise functions. While art professionals normally discuss these works of art in terms of strictly aesthetics, at a stage, it becomes necessary to comprehend the significance of the works of art to the communities who created them (Young-Sa?nchez Denise 16). Almost without exemption, Pre-Columbian art has a heavy religious significance naturally. The ceramics and pottery that have been conserved were mostly temple architecture and items, burial art, and artifacts from sports events that were ultimately religious. Ordinarily, placing ethnographic objects in an inert museum environment makes people forget their original utilities. The Maya sculptor who cautiously molded away on a lump of clay to create a figure did not expect it to be locked away in an art gallery. When people assess these artifacts, detached from their intended place and time, they conclude that they lacked religious significance. Ancient religious occurrences can only be inferred from archaeological materials (Young-Sa?nchez Denise 15). Several clay sculptures discovered in graves may offer little or no proof that they were relevant in religious occasions during the Pre-Classic periods of Ticoman and Zacatenco. It is likely, though, that baked earth figures of females were supposed to symbolize an agricultural idol, a deity of the crops. Two-headed clay figurines unearthed at Tlatilco had a high likelihood of depicting a paranormal being. The same conclusion can be said of the clay idols of a fire god shaped as an old man. The pyramid of Cuicuilco near Mexico is one of the most fascinating monuments that may also have religious meaning. The monument illustrated the main aspects of the Mexican pyramids and this made it seem likely to be a religious shrine, signified by a temple erected on the platform and enclosed by tombs (Young-Sa?nchez Denise 11). Such architecture would have obviously been supervised and organized by several priests. An example is the preoccupation with the afterlife and death itself. Therefore, the ceramics developed by the societies included skulls and devil figurines signified religious activities using these ceramics. The religious significance of pre-Columbian ceramics, that is presently accepted, was initially misinterpreted. In fact, their secular value was the main criteria used when assessing them and this made most of them fail the value test. For many years, Mexican cultivators had been discovering antique ceramic pots and other physical artifacts while cultivating their farms. In the past, collectors considered them useless and even amusing. Because of the low monetary value, they were usually destroyed and discarded. Ordinary household uses Among Pre-Columbian tribes, the vessels used by most households were mainly made of earthenware. These vessels were created in various traditional forms, including globular, ovoid, and cylindrical and double-chambered forms with diverse handles and spouts. These artifacts were used as household utensils, funerary objects, cooking pots, and ritual objects and water jugs. Their form, purpose, and embellishment differentiated the vessels amongst pre-Columbian communities. Zoomorphic and anthropomorphic vessels naturally suggested ritual and funerary use were decorated by more unique and complicated adornments than household earthenware. Although many cultures borrow different elements from each other, each culture developed their vessels having their own particulars and iconography. While most artifacts can be easily categorized as having religious or household significance, some are more difficult to place. Stirrup spout vessels were the main ceramics used that consisted of a handle, and a spout. The immense numbers of existing stirrup spout vessels were suspected to be necessary for funerary purposes. However, the evidence of the wear and tear pointed towards utilitarian purposes within the household (Young-Sa?nchez Denise 24). Conclusion The Pre-Columbian era was marked with a significant contribution by several tribes to the archeological pool that mainly concentrated on ceramics and pottery. The lack of proper writing systems among Pre-Columbian cultures prompted the development of pottery and ceramics as a channel through which history could be recorded. Through these artifacts, the tribes could express and transfer their knowledge to the rest of the world surrounding astronomy, philosophy, cosmology and even religion. The political influences that interfered with the development of these civilizations may have been inconsiderate and unfair but their actions were crucial in dispersing these cultures to different parts of the world where they would have otherwise not reached. Work Cited Bulmer-Thomas, V, John H. Coatsworth, and Conde R. Corte?s. The Cambridge Economic History of Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Print. Fash, William L, Luja?n L. Lo?pez. The Art of Urbanism: How Mesoamerican Kingdoms Represented Themselves in Architecture and Imagery. Washington, D.C: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2009. Print. Ferguson, Jeffrey R.; Siegel, Peter E.; Descantes, Christophe; Glascock, Michael D. Pre-Columbian Pottery in the West Indies: Compositional Change in Context. Journal of Caribbean Archeology. 2008. Kampen-O’Riley, Michael. Art Beyond the West: The Arts of Africa, India and Southeast Asia, China, Japan and Korea, the Pacific, and the Americas. New York: H.N. Abrams, 2002. Print. Schurr, Theodore G. Coastal Waves and Island Hopping: A Genetic View of Caribbean Prehistory and New World Colonization. Island Shores, Distant Pasts: Archaeological and Biological Approaches to the Pre-Columbian Settlement of the Caribbean. 2010: 177-197. Print Young-Sa?nchez, Margaret, Denise P. Schaan. Marajo?: Ancient Ceramics from the Mouth of the Amazon. Denver, CO: Mayer Center for Pre-Columbian Spanish Colonial Art at the Denver Art Museum, 2011. Print.

Monday, February 24, 2020

Starbucks Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Starbucks - Assignment Example The economic forces determine how the entire economy affects the business strategy in terms of market rates, globalization, interest rates, taxation, inflation rate, and the economic growth. In the case of changes in the Starbuck’s marketing strategy The technological forces determine how technology advancements that may include automation and technological advancements affect the business, production, and decision-making. In the case of changes in the Starbuck’s marketing strategy The elements of marketing mix include price, product, promotion, and place. Price relates to the idea that the product sells at a price, which is competitive and profitable. In the Starbuck’s marketing mix includes a pricing strategy that relates price with location. Actually, USA and UK absorb the highest prices for Starbucks products and other location buy coffee at convenient prices. For example, the breakfast sandwich costs between $3.99 and $5.99 depending on location. This enables the company to make profits as well as remain competitive in the market. Furthermore, product defines the suitability of the physical attributes of the product, their uniqueness, their benefits, and functioning. Starbuck’s has a reputation of producing fine products and offering satisfying customer service in all its outlets like the made-to-order gourmet sandwiches. Indeed, Starbucks’ breakfast sandwiches are of much higher quality than those of its competitors. On the other han d, place defines the availability of the product to the customers at the right place and at the right time. Ideally, there are about 9,000 cafes in almost 40 countries in the world, which avails Starbucks’s products to its customers at the right place and at the right time. Additionally, Starbucks’ tests its products in multiple locations before distributing them. Finally, promotion refers the mode of communicating the features and benefits of a product to

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Education Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 5

Education - Essay Example An official curriculum is a written guide from the learner’s perspective clearly describing a designed plan to make both teaching and learning more effective. In education, an official curriculum provides a basis for accountability; it is a framework outlining the specific procedure and plan to be used in the teaching of the content. As a student, you will often notice that different courses have different instructions and resources that can be used to achieve the course objectives that not only state what is expected of the student, but also what is expected of the teacher. Operational curriculum is defined as what is taught by the teacher and how it is communicated (Posner, 2003). An operational curriculum states what students are required to learn in a specific subject, and the knowledge and skills they are to acquire from a particular subject. Operational curriculum helps to gauge how well a student understands the content by relating what is taught in class and the specif ic learning outcomes for the student. For example, the instructional content of mathematics is taught and communicated differently at different grades to ensure the concepts like multiplication and addition are understood proficiently. The hidden curriculum includes the norms and values of the surrounding society (Posner, 2003). The community most often demands that a school curriculum should be able to promote the right values, and as much as the school educational curriculum may be perceived suitable for children in terms of promoting such values, children might be vulnerable to few elements within the society which might pervert the educational process. For this reason, the hidden curriculum... This paper approves that an official curriculum provides a basis for accountability; it is a framework outlining the specific procedure and plan to be used in the teaching of the content. As a student, you will often notice that different courses have different instructions and resources that can be used to achieve the course objectives that not only state what is expected of the student, but also what is expected of the teacher. This paper makes a conclusion that the structure of the disciplines that has been promoted by Jerrold Zacharias, a scientist who for a long time had been attempting to improve the physics curriculum and saw this perspective as an avenue for incorporating modern physics into it. He is of the opinion of teaching only the most fundamental concepts and at the same time teaching students how to derive the rest of the knowledge from the same concept; and in the process of learning a lot of things can be applied practically and less of theory which will just remain in the mind. The Cognitive Perspective has its promoters in science such as Piaget who spent a lot of time trying to understand how children’s minds work and how different their thinking was from that of adults and how it was that they got to â€Å"learn† things that were abstract in nature. He shows how children need to be ready for the cognitive learning process to take place. Behavioral Perspective has been promoted by Edward Thorndike, the founder of behavioral psychology. He provided the necessary scientific theory for behavior through his works on behavioral objectives, in Arithmetic he was able to contribute greatly into the creation of a behavioral curriculum.

Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Pips changing character Essay Example for Free

Pips changing character Essay Explore how dickens builds atmosphere and reveals aspects of Pips changing character in three scenes of your choice. A Great Expectation is considered by many to be Charles Dickens greatest novel. Dickens wrote the book from the first person perspective so when reading the book Pip is telling the story after it actually happened. The story is about the life of Phillip Pirrip (Pip). We follow the growth of Pip. The story follows Pips formation from childhood to adulthood. The story shows us how events in his life change his attitudes. Unfortunately instead of growing up to be a gentleman he turns out a snob. The story is based on how the older generation uses the younger generation to get back at society. We see this when Miss havisham says to Estella Well, you can break his heart. She said this when Estella was complaining about having to play cards with Pip. Miss Havisham wants Estella to break Pips heart because once she had her heart broken . Pip was also being used by Magwitch. Magwitch uses Pip by bringing him to London and bringing him up to be a gentleman. This is getting back at society because society looked down at Magwitch. When Pip visits Miss Havisham for the first time Dickens gives us lots of clues to what she will be like before he actually meets her. Firstly her house is called Satis house which Estella says Its other name was Satis which is Greek or Latin or Hebrew or all 3 or one to me for enough. This is a warning that Miss Havisham is fed up and had enough of life. Also upon arriving at Miss Havishams house Dickens builds up the atmosphere by writing The cold wind seemed to blow colder there than outside the gate and it made a shrill noise in howling in and out at the open sides of the brewery. Like the noise of wind in the rigging of a ship at sea. This creates a gloomy atmosphere and makes the reader think something bad is inside. Once Pip enters Miss Havishams room Dickens writes a paragraph describing Miss Havisham. HE writes about how she is dressed. She was dressed in rich materials satins and lace and silks all of white. Some bright jewels sparkled on her neck and on her hands. This gives us a good impression of her but then Dickens writes but I saw that everything within my view which ought to be white had been white long ago and had lost its lustre, and was faded and yellow. These represents that she was once happy but mow her life has gone sour and she is bitter. The room in which Miss Havisham was had no source of daylight it was lit by the odd candle. This shows us that there is no light left in her life.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Marijuana as a Subculture Essay -- expository essay

A subculture is a group of people who share a distinctive set of cultural beliefs and behaviors that differ in some significant way from that of larger society. Marijuana smokers can be considered a subculture for many reasons. Marijuana is used by millions of people around the world, either for recreational, spiritual, or therapeutic reasons. Some call themselves the cannabis connoisseurs; people who respect cannabis and use it responsibly. Few drugs have been so politicized recently as marijuana has. It is frequently praised by one side and condemned by the other, on the basis of emotional issues rather than an objective view of research. It was 1920 when smoking began to catch on in the United States. Its recreational use was restricted to jazz musicians and people in show business. â€Å"Reefer songs† became the rage of the jazz world. Marijuana clubs, called tea pads, appeared in every major city across the country. Authorities tolerated these establishments because it was not illegal or considered a social threat. In the early 1930’s marijuana became stereotyped as a violent drug, and by 1936 was illegal in all states. Marijuana research was at a stand still and the thought of it being a violent drug faded and the idea that it was a gateway drug emerged in the late 1940’s early 1950’s. In the 1960’s marijuana became very popular among the young college crowd. This was looked at as a challenge to authority and the government. The effects of marijuana are minimal. The high has a feeling of euphoria, peacefulness and well-being. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the active chemical in marijuana. It’s estimated that a person would have to ingest a dose 20,000 to 40,000 times the average dose before death would occur. In the early 1990’s sophisticated research on marijuana began. The scientists discovered THC stimulates special receptors in the brain. Researchers have now isolated a natural substance that appears to produce the same effects as THC in the brain. Recently the medical uses of marijuana are being more and more accepted, and many marijuana smokers wonder how it can be harmful if it helps/treats patients. Marijuana smokers are a subculture because they share sets of beliefs, values, language, and other things that are different from the views of the larger society. They look at things another way because they are pro marijuana, which differs from t... ... believes this to be very true. But the smokers do not want to be associated with the â€Å"pothead† stereotype. They want very much to destroy the connection of marijuana with the tie-dyed, hippy era. Society just assumes smokers are useless, lazy, uneducated bums; which is very inaccurate. There are many hard working people out there that smoke marijuana recreationally to relieve stress. First, this cannot be true because there are an inestimable amount of marijuana smokers that successfully keep their habit a secret. These people are able to blend with society, allowing them to make friends/acquaintances that don’t agree with smoking marijuana. People who use marijuana do not look negatively upon the rest of society. They relate and form bonds with the whole culture as normal people would. Marijuana smokers are a subculture for the reasons previously described above. They share a different set of values, beliefs, and etc. from the rest of society. For example, they have their own terms that describe their practices. They don’t mind society but part of society minds them, maybe one day marijuana use won’t be as frowned upon. All of these things make marijuana smokers a subculture. Marijuana as a Subculture Essay -- expository essay A subculture is a group of people who share a distinctive set of cultural beliefs and behaviors that differ in some significant way from that of larger society. Marijuana smokers can be considered a subculture for many reasons. Marijuana is used by millions of people around the world, either for recreational, spiritual, or therapeutic reasons. Some call themselves the cannabis connoisseurs; people who respect cannabis and use it responsibly. Few drugs have been so politicized recently as marijuana has. It is frequently praised by one side and condemned by the other, on the basis of emotional issues rather than an objective view of research. It was 1920 when smoking began to catch on in the United States. Its recreational use was restricted to jazz musicians and people in show business. â€Å"Reefer songs† became the rage of the jazz world. Marijuana clubs, called tea pads, appeared in every major city across the country. Authorities tolerated these establishments because it was not illegal or considered a social threat. In the early 1930’s marijuana became stereotyped as a violent drug, and by 1936 was illegal in all states. Marijuana research was at a stand still and the thought of it being a violent drug faded and the idea that it was a gateway drug emerged in the late 1940’s early 1950’s. In the 1960’s marijuana became very popular among the young college crowd. This was looked at as a challenge to authority and the government. The effects of marijuana are minimal. The high has a feeling of euphoria, peacefulness and well-being. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the active chemical in marijuana. It’s estimated that a person would have to ingest a dose 20,000 to 40,000 times the average dose before death would occur. In the early 1990’s sophisticated research on marijuana began. The scientists discovered THC stimulates special receptors in the brain. Researchers have now isolated a natural substance that appears to produce the same effects as THC in the brain. Recently the medical uses of marijuana are being more and more accepted, and many marijuana smokers wonder how it can be harmful if it helps/treats patients. Marijuana smokers are a subculture because they share sets of beliefs, values, language, and other things that are different from the views of the larger society. They look at things another way because they are pro marijuana, which differs from t... ... believes this to be very true. But the smokers do not want to be associated with the â€Å"pothead† stereotype. They want very much to destroy the connection of marijuana with the tie-dyed, hippy era. Society just assumes smokers are useless, lazy, uneducated bums; which is very inaccurate. There are many hard working people out there that smoke marijuana recreationally to relieve stress. First, this cannot be true because there are an inestimable amount of marijuana smokers that successfully keep their habit a secret. These people are able to blend with society, allowing them to make friends/acquaintances that don’t agree with smoking marijuana. People who use marijuana do not look negatively upon the rest of society. They relate and form bonds with the whole culture as normal people would. Marijuana smokers are a subculture for the reasons previously described above. They share a different set of values, beliefs, and etc. from the rest of society. For example, they have their own terms that describe their practices. They don’t mind society but part of society minds them, maybe one day marijuana use won’t be as frowned upon. All of these things make marijuana smokers a subculture.