Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Compare and Contrast the Acaââ¬â¢s 5 Moral Principles (Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, Beneficence, Justice, Fidelity) with Clinton & Ohlschlagerââ¬â¢s 7 Virtues on Co P. 248-249.
The American Counseling Association has identified several(prenominal) moral  regulations to assist in  manoeuver their members and others interested in the  helpering professions. Of these the  by-line five will be compared and contrasted with  versatile biblical ethics identified by Clinton & Oblschalager (2002) as being  septette  impartialitys (pp. 248-249) autonomy, nonmaleficence,  humanity,  arbitrator, and   fidelity. The seven virtues are composed of the following  office and truth-telling, responsibility to love  iodin another, fidelity to  justness, trustworthiness in keeping confidentiality,   satisfactory beneficence, humility in justice, and sufferability (ibid).Autonomy is outlined as the freedom of clients to choose their  birth  centering (Corey, G. , Corey, M. S. , & Callanan. 2007, p. 17). Nonmaleficence is the avoidance of actions which may  languish clients (ibid). Beneficence is promotion of the welfare of others (p. 18).  justness refers to being fair in  impac   t distribution of resources and care without biases of any  graphic symbol (ibid). Fidelity refers to  unrivalled keeping their  war cry as a professional (ibid)The virtue of accountability and truth-telling shares the similarity with the moral  regulation of fidelity in that both  sanction being truthful in our  course and promises. Above that this virtue  in any case requires that  whiz be held accountable to another  counselor or  adepts subgenus Pastor (Clinton & Oblschalager, p. 248). The virtue of the responsibility to love one another shares with the precept of nonmaleficence the characteristic of doing others no  aggrieve, yet goes beyond that to include the  essence given gift of demonstrating love for one another (ibid).The virtue of humility in justice basically mirrors the  prescript of justice.  two these traits should mean the counselor will  neer judge the individual seeking help and to never discriminate in the allocation of resources. The virtue of humility in justi   ce also entails remembering to be  sink in emulation of the Messiah who  lone(prenominal) sought for others to be restored to a  serious relation with  theology (p. 249). Competent beneficence is a virtue comparable to the principle of beneficence. They both are focused on the wellbeing f others and on the  awareness of the counselor to be culturally competent (ibid). The virtues of trustworthiness in keeping confidentiality, fidelity to  rightfulness and sufferability can be  put side by side with the principle of nonmaleficence since they all entail the mandate of not allowing the client to suffer any harm due to the counselors  spoken communication or actions. Fidelity to integrity also entails the counselors personal integrity as needing to accompany his professional integrity (Clinton & Oblschalager, p. 248).Ultimately, the clients we encounter as Christian counselors do have autonomy to choose this principle and go in whatever direction they choose to go. Nevertheless, this is    not a  divided characteristic with any of the seven virtues. In our practice we are to recognize that  matinee idol has moral absolutes and a perfect  expression in which God has chosen for us to walk (Clinton & Oblschalager, p. 246). To utilize the seven virtues we  must remember that doing good, telling truth, loving one another, and the rest of the virtues all point  direct towards our creator.Therefore, although our clients may choose to ignore our  providential counsel, we are in debt to them and our vows of service to God to inform them and encourage them to cease from  terrible behaviors and to turn those behaviors around to reflect behaviors  demonstrate . References Clinton, T. , & Ohlschlager, G. (Eds. ). (2002). Competent Christian Counseling Foundations and  utilization of Compassionate Soul Care. Colorado Springs, CO WaterBrook Press. Corey, G. , Corey, M. S. , & Callanan, P. (2007). Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions (7th ed. ). Belmont, CA Brooks/Cole  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.